A scalar environmental justice analysis of local arguments for and against a low-carbon “Energy Coast” in Suffolk, England

Closed

Guy Jackson, Sakshi

2026 Geoforum Vol. 176 Article Cited by 0 SDG 17SDG 7 Quartile

Abstract

Enabled by ecologically unequal exchange, overconsumption by wealthy states and populations is a key driver of unevenly experienced climate and environmental crises. Whilst most states seek to reduce emissions, many, such as the United Kingdom (UK), ignore capitalist growth imperatives and overconsumption and instead centre supply-side policies such as low-carbon energy production. The county of Suffolk, England, has become a ground zero for low-carbon energy projects with Sizewell C nuclear power station, offshore wind, and National Grid infrastructure comprising an “Energy Coast” spatial imaginary. Our ethnographic research captures the dominant perspectives amongst diverse actors and identifies arguments for and against the Energy Coast. We pay particular attention to those arguments that depend on justice claims and undertake a scalar environmental justice analysis with a focus on global scales. Overall, we find a territorially bounded political response, in which local concerns and national security are centred. Amongst supporters, pro-economic growth and energy security discourses prevailed, while those who opposed emphasised harms to existing industries, local environment, and amenities. Many perspectives depended on justice claims, but most were limited to a few select dimensions (e.g., social justice, ecological impacts) at local and national scales. Whilst these arguments remain convincing and politically useful for local actors, they obscure the underlying drivers and unequal impacts of climate and environmental harms globally. We argue that such political subjectivities, many of which were shared by supporters and opponents, are symptomatic of deeply rooted ideologies of economic growth and spatial imaginaries of energy transition that are confined to nation states. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Affiliations

Centre for Pacific Action for Climate Transitions, Monash Business School, Monash University, Australia; School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom; Indigenous Law and Justice Hub, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Australia; The Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia

Research at a Glance

Premium content — register to unlock

Research at a Glance

Register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Premium content — register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Register to unlock

Collaboration

Premium content — register to unlock

Collaboration

Register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Premium content — register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Register to unlock

References Overview

Premium content — register to unlock

References Overview

Register to unlock

Journal & Source

Premium content — register to unlock

Journal & Source

Register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Premium content — register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Register to unlock